Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Nord Aviation Nord 262"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Another bad habit of English Wikipedia ... The [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord-Aviation French page] is right : Nord-Aviation and [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Aviation Sud-Aviation] are the right way to write them. But I must say, lots of documents of the both companies themselves were uncorrectly written, without the dash. [[User:LVCDC|LVCDC]] 04:54, 6 March 2015 (MST) | : Another bad habit of English Wikipedia ... The [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord-Aviation French page] is right : Nord-Aviation and [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Aviation Sud-Aviation] are the right way to write them. But I must say, lots of documents of the both companies themselves were uncorrectly written, without the dash. [[User:LVCDC|LVCDC]] 04:54, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I agree with you, but if you prefer to change all Sud Aviation Caravelles in Sud-Aviation C... it's up to you...[[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 12:43, 6 March 2015 (MST) |
Revision as of 19:43, 6 March 2015
Changed Nord-Aviation to Nord Aviation as Sud Aviation already listed.Sixcyl 13:35, 5 March 2015 (MST)
- Another bad habit of English Wikipedia ... The French page is right : Nord-Aviation and Sud-Aviation are the right way to write them. But I must say, lots of documents of the both companies themselves were uncorrectly written, without the dash. LVCDC 04:54, 6 March 2015 (MST)
I agree with you, but if you prefer to change all Sud Aviation Caravelles in Sud-Aviation C... it's up to you...Sixcyl 12:43, 6 March 2015 (MST)