Difference between revisions of "Talk:King Kong (1976)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Kooshmeister (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Have changed the title to just 206 because both the A and B model are seen so 206A is not representative of them both. [[User:Bthebest|Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator]] 14:47, 7 March 2011 (MST) | Have changed the title to just 206 because both the A and B model are seen so 206A is not representative of them both. [[User:Bthebest|Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator]] 14:47, 7 March 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | :My suggestion would be to do as I did with [[Commando]] where I listed the JetRanger II and unidentified JetRanger(s) separate from each other due to being different models. I'll do so if there are no objections. I like being thorough. - [[User:Kooshmeister|Kooshmeister]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:09, 7 March 2011
1933 Links
Is the 1933 film going to be put up soon, because otherwise should really remove the links. Bthebest 08:05, 6 January 2011 (MST)
- Yes. - Kooshmeister
The airplane is a Douglas DC-7. Sixcyl
Serial... 4?
Rotorsport gives the Petrox JetRanger's serial number as 4. Does this mean it is literally the fourth JetRanger ever? - Kooshmeister
- Appears to be. Only a handful of 206A's were produced as they were initial production versions. Have changed it too '004' as it makes it clearer. Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 04:05, 7 March 2011 (MST)
206(A)
Have changed the title to just 206 because both the A and B model are seen so 206A is not representative of them both. Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 14:47, 7 March 2011 (MST)
- My suggestion would be to do as I did with Commando where I listed the JetRanger II and unidentified JetRanger(s) separate from each other due to being different models. I'll do so if there are no objections. I like being thorough. - Kooshmeister