Difference between revisions of "File talk:DESSUK.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
cheers [[User:RenoRacer|RenoRacer]] 02:39, 13 January 2011 (MST) | cheers [[User:RenoRacer|RenoRacer]] 02:39, 13 January 2011 (MST) | ||
:They look quite different from this angle, not as sleek. I suppose the tailplane is a giveaway. [[User:Bthebest|Bthebest]] 06:13, 13 January 2011 (MST) | :They look quite different from this angle, not as sleek. I suppose the tailplane is a giveaway. [[User:Bthebest|Bthebest]] 06:13, 13 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :well, navy style, forward-mounted twin (2 tires) tail-gear underneath fuselage - not tail boom - as we find it in army airframes. Lack of radar will make this helicopter non ASW version. So it is not SH-60B neither is SH-60J or SH-60R. | ||
| + | Weapons pylon clearly visible on the starboard side, where it is supposed to be. | ||
| + | NSW/CSAR HH-60H. | ||
| + | [[User:RenoRacer|RenoRacer]] 20:23, 15 January 2011 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:23, 16 January 2011
Unidentified aircraft
A pair of Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk
cheers RenoRacer 02:39, 13 January 2011 (MST)
- They look quite different from this angle, not as sleek. I suppose the tailplane is a giveaway. Bthebest 06:13, 13 January 2011 (MST)
- well, navy style, forward-mounted twin (2 tires) tail-gear underneath fuselage - not tail boom - as we find it in army airframes. Lack of radar will make this helicopter non ASW version. So it is not SH-60B neither is SH-60J or SH-60R.
Weapons pylon clearly visible on the starboard side, where it is supposed to be. NSW/CSAR HH-60H. RenoRacer 20:23, 15 January 2011 (MST)
